Wakefield (2010) observed that sources from ITU ranked
countries based on internet connectivity, where the more economically developed
countries are the most connected. Reports from NAF also showed that the
internet usage of a nation was not proportionately represented as the rural
areas tend to have lesser internet access and usage. Thus, the less developed
countries in Europe tried to increase their countries' access to internet by
providing wifi infrastructure to their suburban villages. This helped some
villagers to improve their lives socially, economically and culturally.
Although I live in a developed country like Singapore, I do
not consider technology a basic need in life. I was quite shocked that the
world have placed more focus on technological advancement over other
necessities such as food and healthcare. I believe that it boils down to how we
define our needs and wants.
As a science student, I have learnt that the basic needs for
human survival was food (including water), shelter, clothing and basic
healthcare. Technology was not mention at all. In many developing countries,
what the citizens need was not the access to computers or wifi connections, but
to have sufficient food and water to survive. Taking Eastern Europe as an
example, Wakefield (2010) reported that the government was coming up with a wifi
village programme to reach out to those of its population living in rural
poverty. However, there were also many Street
children and orphans in Eastern Europe who faced many problems
and troubles such as malnutrition and HIV. Therefore, Instead of focusing on wifi connectivity, I
feel that developing countries should focus more on basic necessities for
survival before moving on to luxuries.
In many developing countries, education may not be adequate.
Even if the citizens were provided with internet access and information in the
tip of their fingers, they may not know how to utilise it well. Statistics
shown that for all Africans over the age of 15 and 50% of women above the age
of 25 are illiterate and that half the population of Africa
lives on less than US $1 a day. Even if wifi connections and computer
access was provide, most African will not know how to utilise it. Furthermore,
they do not have the economical capability to own a computer. Hence, I feel
that if countries such as Africa wants direct resources to implement the wifi
village scheme as reported by Wakefield (2010), it will better if these
resources are diverted to providing more basic necessities.
World wakes up to digital divide by Wakefield (2010) clearly
shown that technological advancement have been considered a basic human
necessity in developed countries. Many developing countries have neglected the
basic necessities and have concentrated their resources onto technological
advancement in order to be considered “developed”. This problems seems to be
persisting until countries can correctly differentiate their needs and wants.
From Kai Teng and Hai En:
ReplyDelete1) Your thesis is not very clear
2) The connection between the first and second paragraph is not very well-connected
3) There isn't much link from the original article to your response
4) There are a few verb tense errors
5) No references